Methods of Impurities Calculation
Methods
of Impurities Calculation
According to ICH guidelines impurities can be broadly classified into three categories as Organic Impurities, Inorganic Impurities and Residual Solvents. Related
substances are defined as impurities derived from the drug substance and
therefore not including impurities from excipients. Related substances include
degradation products, synthetic impurities of drug substance and manufacturing
process impurities from the drug product. Various concepts are used for the quantitation
of impurities which are elaborated in this article.
1.
External standard approach against quantitative RS for
impurities.
In
this method quantitation is performed against an external standard of impurity
itself. An external standard also serves as positive impurity peak
identification rather than relying on relative retention times which are
subject to reliability. Quantitation of impurities using this method provides
accurate results.
For example: Related substances calculation
for Gabapentin tablets:
Standard
solution—Dissolve accurately weighed quantities of USP Gabapentin RS and
USP Gabapentin Related Compound A RS in Diluent to
obtain a solution having a known concentration of about 0.04 mg of each per mL.
Test
solution—Weigh and finely powder not fewer than 20 Tablets. Transfer an
accurately weighed portion of the powder,equivalent to about 500 mg of
gabapentin, to a suitable volumetric flask, and dissolve the contents in Diluent
with sonication, if necessary, for about 30 seconds. Dilute with Diluent
to volume, and mix to obtain a final solution having a known
concentration of about 20 mg per mL, based on the label claim.
Calculate
the percentage of gabapentin related compound A in the portion of Tablets taken
by the formula:
100(CS / CT)(rU / rS)
Area of RCA in
test 0.04
% RCA = --------------------------------- x
--------- x 100
Area of RCA in Standard 20
in
which CS is the concentration, in mg per mL, of USP
Gabapentin Related Compound A RS in the Standard solution;
CT
is the concentration, in mg per mL, of gabapentin in the Test
solution, based on the label claim;
and
rU
and rS are the individual peak responses to obtain a
final solution having a known concentration of about for gabapentin related
compound A obtained from the Test solution and Standard
solution, respectively: not more than 0.4% of gabapentin related compound A
is found.
Calculate
the percentage of any other unspecified degradation product relative to
gabapentin content in the portion of Tablets taken using the formula:
100(CS / CT)(ri / rS)
Area of imp in test 0.04
% imp = - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x - - - - x 100
Area of standard 20
In
which CS is the concentration, in mg per mL, of USP
Gabapentin RS in the Standard solution;
CT
is the concentration, in mg per mL, of gabapentin in the Test
solution, based on the label claim;
ri
is the response for each unspecified impurity in the Test
solution; and rS is the peak response for gabapentin in the Standard
solution: not more than 0.1% of any individual unspecified degradation
product is found; and not more than 1.0% of total impurities is found.
Total
impurities = Sum of all unknown impurities and Gabapentin RCA
2.
External standard approach against the peak of the
analyte, using RRF as needed.
The RRF of an impurity is defined as the ratio of the
peak response of the impurity to that of an equal mass of the drug substance.
The RRF, calculated as defined above, is placed in the denominator in the
formula for calculating percent impurity. RRF values in monographs should be
stated to one decimal place if the value is equal to or greater than 1.0 and to
two decimal places if it is less than 1.0. The RRF values can be rounded off to
1.0 in USP–NF monographs if they are in the range 0.8–1.2.
For example: Organic
impurities calculation for Montelukast chewable tablets:
Standard solution: 0.33 mg/mL of USP Montelukast Dicyclohexylamine RS in Diluent
Sensitivity solution: 0.33 mg/mL of USP Montelukast Dicyclohexylamine RS in Diluent from the Standard Solution
Sample solution (for 5-mg Chewable Tablets): Nominally 0.25 mg/mL of montelukast prepared as follows. Transfer 10 Chewable Tablets to a suitable volumetric flask, add 75% of the flask volume of Diluent, and shake vigorously for 60 min. Dilute with Diluent to volume. Pass a portion of the resulting solution through a suitable filter of 0.45-mm pore size, discarding the first mL of filtrate. Use the filtrate.
Samples:
Standard
solution and Sample solution
Calculate
the percentage of any individual degradation product in the portion of Chewable
Tablets
rS = peak
response of montelukast from the Standard solution
CS =
concentration of USP Montelukast Dicyclohexylamine RS in the Standard
solution (mg/mL)
CU = nominal
concentration of montelukast in the Sample solution (mg/mL)
M r1 =
molecular weight of montelukast, 586.18
Mr2
= molecular weight of montelukast dicyclohexylamine, 767.50
F = relative
response factor
Acceptance criteria: See Table.
Name |
RRF |
Acceptance criteria
(NMT %) |
Sulfoxide impurity |
1.0 |
1.5 |
Montelukast ketone impurity |
1.7 |
0.2 |
cis-Isomer |
1.0 |
0.2 |
Any other individual degradation product |
1.0 |
0.2 |
Total impurities |
- |
2.0 |
As mentioned in above calculation method, the formula for individual known and unknown impurities will be
Imp area 0.33 586.18 1
%Imp=---------------x---------x-----------x-------- x 100
Std Area 0.25 767.50 RRF
Total impurities = Sum of all unknown and known
impurities
3.
Area normalization
using the formula 100(ri/rs) in which ri is the peak
response for each impurity and rs is the sum of the responses of all the
peaks in sample solution.
For
example: Organic impurities calculation for
Metformin Hydrochloride Extended-Release Tablets:
Calculate the percentage of each impurity in
the portion of Tablets taken:
Result
= (rU/rT) × 100
rU = peak
response for each impurity
rT
= sum of all the peak
responses
In this case, no need to include peak response of
standard solution in calculation, but can be injected to check system
suitability.
Acceptance criteria
Individual impurities: NMT 0.1%
Total impurities: NMT 0.6%
[NOTE—Disregard any peak less than 0.05%, and
disregard any peak observed in the blank.]
4.
Quantitation against the peak of the analyte in the
diluted test solutions
While
this approach is being commonly used in existing Ph. Eur. monographs,
USP’s preference is to use the external standard approach.
In
this method, inject a solution of the substance to be examined at the concentration
corresponding to disregard limit (0.05% of test solution) and note the area of
principle peak. Disregard all the peaks in the chromatogram of the test
solution with an area less than or equal to this peak area.
For
calculation of Specified and unspecified impurities, compare the area of
individual peak with (x times) the area of the peak obtained with the reference
solution, as stated in the monograph.
For
total impurities, sum up the areas of individual peaks and compare the figure
with (y times) the area of the peak obtained with the reference solution, as
stated in the monograph.
For example: Related
substances calculation for Amiodarone Tablets
Solution (1)
: Mix with the aid of ultrasound for 15 minutes a quantity of the powdered
tablets containing 50 mg of Amiodarone Hydrochloride with 50 mL of methanol, allow to
cool and filter through a 0.45-mm PTFE filter. Dilute 1 volume of the solution
to 2 volumes with a mixture of equal volumes of acetonitrile and water.
Solution (2) : Dilute 1 volume of solution (1) to 50 volumes and further dilute 1 volume of the resulting solution to 10 volumes with a mixture of equal volumes of acetonitrile and water.
Solution (3) : Dilute 1 volume of solution (2) to 4 volumes with a mixture of equal volumes of acetonitrile and water.
Solution (4) : Dissolve 10 mg each of amiodarone impurity D BPCRS and amiodarone impurity E EPCRS in methanol and dilute to 50 mL with the same solvent. Dilute 1 volume of the solution to 200 volumes with a mixture of equal volumes of acetonitrile and water.
Calculation:
In the chromatogram obtained with solution (1): the area of any peak corresponding to impurity D is not greater than 2.5 times the area of the peak due to impurity D in the chromatogram obtained with solution (4) (0.5%);
The area of any other secondary peak is not greater than the peak due to amiodarone in the chromatogram obtained with solution (2) (0.2%);
The sum of the areas of all the secondary peaks is not greater than 5 times the area of the peak due to Amiodarone in the chromatogram obtained with solution (2).
Disregard any peak with an area less than the area of the peak due to amiodarone in the chromatogram obtained with solution (3) (0.05%).
Acceptance Criteria:
Impurity D –
NMT 0.5%
Any other
unspecified impurity - NMT 0.2%
Total
impurities – NMT 1.0%
5.
For drug products labeled in terms of free acid/free
base, a correction factor may be needed.
This
concept is used above in related substances of Montelukast chewable tablets as
Mr1 and Mr2. Generally this can be applied in the calculation as
X free acid or free base formula weight / salt
formula weight.
Note : While considering unspecified impurity peaks, the peaks due to blank and placebo should be disregarded. In practical calculation of impurities exactly weighed standard and sample weights, potency of standard or external standard should be used. For calculation of dosage forms, average weight, label claim should be used. For example for tablet the simplified calculation formula will be as follows:
%Impurity =
Imp area Std.Conc Avg Wt. Potency
---------------x------------x--------------x------------- x 100
Std area Spl conc. label claim 100
Conclusion :
The above mentioned methods are generally used for related substances or impurities calculation. External standard method is considered as most accurate among all the above methods. These concepts can be well understood with the practical calculation using chromatograms.
Hope this post will be useful for readers. We will
try to post next article related to pharmaceutical industries as early as
possible. Please share your valuable comments after reading.
Comments
Post a Comment